The Pine Cone's fifth story of the
        week

Previous Home Next

Hearings offer locals a chance to sound off on housing crisis

By CHRIS COUNTS

Published: January 25, 2013

FOR MANY people who work in Big Sur’s service industry, finding a place to live  down the coast is an almost impossible task, leading some to commute vast distances and others to even sleep in their cars. But a handful of community leaders want to change that by amending local laws to allow the construction of more workforce housing.

It’s just one of many issues that will be discussed when the Big Sur and South Coast land use advisory committees meet Jan. 28 at the Big Sur Multi-Agency Facility. The two LUACs plan to host additional hearings weekly for several months.

After receiving input from the public, the two groups will make recommendations to Monterey County officials regarding updates to the Big Sur Land Use Plan.

The owner of Treebones Resort and a member of the South Coast LUAC, John Handy told The Pine Cone this week that Big Sur’s famously tough building restrictions — combined with a generation’s worth of public land acquisitions — threaten to rob Big Sur’s community of its vitality.

“We’re losing our community,” Handy said. “Our population has shrunk. It’s hard for people to live and work here. This community is fragile.”

Handy said he’s not discounting the need to protect Big Sur’s stunning landscape and rural character, but he believes Big Sur’s eclectic human population — and its vibrant artistic culture — is worth saving as well.

“People come here for the beauty, but they also come here for the unique community that exists,” he said. “There’s a funkiness about it that makes it special.”

Handy suggested that building restrictions be loosened to permit what he calls “some rational development” to meet critical needs in the community, particularly those of people who work in Big Sur and are required to commute many miles along a narrow and winding highway each day because nearby housing isn’t available.
Solving Big Sur’s workforce housing dilemma would have little impact on the environment, Handy suggested. “Less than one percent of Big Sur’s land mass is privately held,” he explained.

Another challenge for anyone seeking to build workforce housing is the high cost of getting a permit, Handy said.
Handy praised Monterey County officials for their willingness to consider the input of residents when updating the Big Sur Land Use Plan, which was adopted by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors in 1985 and certified in 1986 by the California Coastal Commission. “The Monterey County Planning Department is being very cooperative,” he said. “When a government agency steps out of its comfort zone, it needs to be acknowledged.”

In addition to workforce housing, the weekly meetings will offer the public an opportunity to comment on “anything and everything” that’s contained in the Big Sur Land Use Plan, said Big Sur LUAC chair Mary Trotter. Fire protection, development on slopes and drilling wells are just a few subjects that will likely be raised.
“If people have a topic they’d like to discuss, we encourage them to attend these meetings,” she said. “We’re seeking public input.”

The meetings start at 9:30 a.m. The Big Sur Multi-Agency Facility is located at Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park about 26 miles south of Carmel. To see a copy of the Big Sur Land Use Plan, visit: www.co.monterey.ca.us/planning/docs/plans/big_sur_lup_complete.pdf.