
| Previous | Home | Next |
Editorial: The right way to preserve open space
THE STATE of California has
a sorry history of government intimidation, harassment and
abuse of property owners who want to do something with their
land.
Nevermind that using your property for an economically
beneficial purpose — farming it, logging it or building
something on it — is a constitutional right, entities such as
the California Coastal Commission, goaded by environmental
zealots and enabled by irresponsible legislators, have
specialized in grabbing open space for the public without
paying for it. If private property is to be left undeveloped,
the owner should either do so voluntarily — as Clint Eastwood
did, for example, with the Odello property on the east side of
Highway 1 — or he should receive fair compensation, as has
occasionally happened, as well.
An outstanding example of the right way to preserve open space
is the acquisition two weeks ago of a prime piece of
residential property on 17 Mile Drive by the Del Monte Forest
Conservancy. This land will now remain undeveloped in
perpetuity, thanks to the generosity of a handful of anonymous
donors in Pebble Beach who ponied up the $4.1 million to buy
the land. Undoubtedly some of them acted partly in self
interest, because they have views across the property from
their own homes. But that doesn’t matter. The point is that
the family that sold the property did so voluntarily because
they received a fair price, and the people who paid for it
must have also received what they considered a fair return,
because they acted on their own initiative.
We thank them all, not only for giving the public something
precious, but for doing so the right way.